I was excited about this game, having played pen-and-paper Pathfinder for... however many years it's been out now. I'd heard good things Kingmaker (the tabletop version), but didn't know anyone wanting to run it, so this seemed like the next best thing. And I loved the game... up to the point where I had to start managing my kingdom, and for some reason it just really tedious really fast for me. I quickly found myself low on resources, particularly in the "human" resources department (though not literally humans, of course.) Events would come up and I wouldn't have the appropriate person available to take care of it because I'd assigned them to something else a day earlier.
I think I actually prefer the Stronghold system of Pillars of Eternity, even though it's a bit more scripted. I still get that feeling of ruling over a domain, but without feeling like I'm having to juggle two different games at once. I don't know if I just got off on the wrong foot with the Kingmaker portion, or if I'm just not cut out for that gameplay style, or what. (I'm no good at the likes of Crusader Kings, either.)
I want to give it another shot since I liked the rest of the game, but it seems problematic that the namesake portion ended up being a turnoff for me.
I think I actually prefer the Stronghold system of Pillars of Eternity, even though it's a bit more scripted. I still get that feeling of ruling over a domain, but without feeling like I'm having to juggle two different games at once. I don't know if I just got off on the wrong foot with the Kingmaker portion, or if I'm just not cut out for that gameplay style, or what. (I'm no good at the likes of Crusader Kings, either.)
I want to give it another shot since I liked the rest of the game, but it seems problematic that the namesake portion ended up being a turnoff for me.