So how should we do "retro"? Everything more than X years old? Everything from year Y and earlier?
We shouldn't get tied up in defining it, and avoid "That's not retro" "It is too!" wars 🙂
If you think it's retro, post about it.
No new game released in the last 20 years is retro.
All games over 25 years old are retro
there is a 5 year grey period where it could be maybe retro
I don't think retro should be defined as a specific subset of games. I would say it's more like nostalgia, something that reminds you of "the past", where the cut-off for what is considered "the past" and "current" is different for different people.
So I hadn't checked out this
Retro Section before because I thought that it must be about arcade-type games, or text-based games, or early console games; and I felt that I didn't have any relevant information to post. But if we're discussing "old-school" type gaming then I'm enthused, and apologies for being so late in checking out this section.
But as far as the definition of "retro gaming" is concerned, I thought I'd check out this post to get an answer, but it seems as if there are a variety of opinions on what constitutes "retro". Is it a time frame as
@Colif suggested? The player's age could also be factor there in the perception of what's retro as
@Pifanjr &
@Krud mentioned. My perspective as a 68-year-old gamer is going to be different from someone 28, 38, 48, or 58 years of age.
I'm more inclined to agree w/
@Brian Boru in that we should avoid a strict definition to avoid the "retro wars", and just post based on your personal perception.
Just off the top of my head I'll list a handful of games that I think are retro, : the Wizardry and Might & Magic games, the Ulima Games, the Realms of Arkania games, Gabriel Knight games, Lands of Lore, Betrayal at Krondor, Fallouts 1 &2, even the 1st Diablo. All of those are retro games to me.