yeah AA was a damn decent game. I argue it was probably a linear metroidvania as you could explore but if you follow the objectives you will eventually circle back to previous areas and complete them as needed.
What i liked about AC was that it seemed like a natural progression up from AA. We had the advantage of a lot more varied areas/scenary and we get to see more of batman's villains in play. Some people say that perhaps some rogues only got a small part when they deserved more. Like clay face being the final boss is a massive cop out and we see other minor characters make cameos when they could have been a more significant time. Arkahm knight just took it too far with it. I mean who the hell is black friar? Dr Pyg only makes a small role and raz al ghul/ league of assassins has an even smaller part that its embarassing.
You remember the specifics way better than I do. I have flashes but its probably mixed up in my head with Arkham Origins which I also played about the same amount. I remember I liked the combat and that the city looked great, but that I got a bit annoyed with the side stuff feeling repetitive after a bit and thats about it lol.
