Headphone random conversation

[anort3]

How the heck did you spot that???

Even if I did pay attention to this thread, I'd never remember a post from hundreds earlier.

Nuke launched

I was a mod on Tom's Hardware and Tom's Guide from 2013-2021 and a mod on What HiFi from 2020-2021. I killed a BUNCH of spammers over the years. lol

 

[Colif]

Unless it was a copy of your own post, i don't see how you spotted it. Its not the first time someone copied something to post it here...

 

[anort3]

It was a single post from a new user with a spammy username and it was completely out of context to the ongoing conversation. They're always copy/pastes and 99% of the time it's from page 1 of a thread. Seen it a thousand times.

90 out of 100 will be edited with a spam link or a spam link will be added to their sig. The other 10 are testing an IP range.

 

[Brian Boru]

@anort3 Excellent detection!

 

[ZedClampet]

I don't want to start a fight, but I was thinking about the charge that some reviewers only use the 80 to 100 part of their review scale, but that's okay if they are only reviewing quality headsets. A lot of people will pretend to disagree with this, but headphone driver tech has improved so much in the last 10 years that a $100 headset is nearly indistinguishable, sound-wise, from a much more expensive set. And by indistinguishable, I mean they should be scored in the same general ballpark. To be sure, in most cases a $1000 headset will get you a little better sound, but $100 headsets also have good sound so long as they aren't gaming headsets, which tend to struggle a little, but even those should probably be no less than an 80 on a 100 scale.

 

[anort3]

I don't want to start a fight, but I was thinking about the charge that some reviewers only use the 80 to 100 part of their review scale, but that's okay if they are only reviewing quality headsets. A lot of people will pretend to disagree with this, but headphone driver tech has improved so much in the last 10 years that a $100 headset is nearly indistinguishable, sound-wise, from a much more expensive set. And by indistinguishable, I mean they should be scored in the same general ballpark. To be sure, in most cases a $1000 headset will get you a little better sound, but $100 headsets also have good sound so long as they aren't gaming headsets, which tend to struggle a little, but even those should probably be no less than an 80 on a 100 scale.

I disagree. I've owned the meat of what's considered 'audiophile' headphones in the $150-$1500 range. There's a HUGE difference. Has the low end improved over the years? Absolutely. The Sennheiser 560S is as low as $120ish on sale and it's absolutely entry level audiophile. But it's not as good as the $300 HiFiMan Sundara. Which isn't as good as XXX.....ect. There are distinct price range steps. Resolution, dynamics, soundstage, bass and treble extension, comfort, build quality......all get 'better' as the price goes up. Not in every case of course. There is certainly some overpriced stuff on the market that's beaten by much cheaper stuff.

 

[Colif]

IEM have gotten a lot better in the last 10 years, as the competition in that market is huge right now. So that is one place that has changed. 5 years ago people were charging stupid amounts for single driver IEM, now you need to have about 20 in there to charge stupid amounts. One pair I have has 6 drivers in it, I think? thats each ear.

ANC headphones are improving, more brands are making them. Competition to not only block noise but sound good doing it is fierce. I am not interested in them but new ones coming out all the time, in the price ranges mentioned.

I haven't had enough over ear headphones to comment. 90% of the headphones I have ever bought were earbuds. Never again.

 

[ZedClampet]

Well, somehow I broke those nice cables for my IEM and possibly broke the IEM in the process. I've got new cables coming. If that IEM is broken, I bought the $10 insurance for it on a whim, so I can send it back. No idea how I managed to bend the thing. I'm beginning to think that I wasn't cut out for IEMs. They are too fragile or I'm too much of an ogre, one or the other.

 

[Colif]

The cables were the one weakness with earbuds so its probably same with iem.
Having broken one already I am being cautious with the replacements. Even though most come with soft carrying cases, I don't really use them... when I am not using them I place them on top of my Dac to keep them safe and out of the way of opening drawers, as I think I closed a drawer on the cable the first time, which might have been problem

I am being careful not to do it to my headphones cable as well. Might need to rethink where it sits

I assume you don't want wireless as these let you use IEM wirelessly.

I don't want these as I don't want to use my phone. I am also know the latest BT isn't really fully lossless so I stick to cables until it is. Current top level BT "lossless" drops down to lossy if the BT signal degrades. Pass.