When I read the Diablo 4 articles at PCGamer I can't help but wonder if there is an undertone of bias against the game. I'm not arguing there aren't problems...but things like fighting a level 25 boss with a cap of level 20 are obviously only down to the beta limitations.
There is also a sense of wanting to compare the beta to a 10 year old live service game in path of exile. Is it going to be as polished or as deep as poe at launch? Doubtful. But I feel this attitude is why companies increasingly just patch the same game for decades rather than try their hand at sequels. It's higher risk but in my opinion we want to see big titles get sequels rather than yet another expansion or dlc.
I don't mind the critical commentary. That's PCGamer's job. But I think the overall negative tone based on items that are transient within the betas isnt very helpful to the readership. Unless the idea is to push everyone just sticking to the aging titles in the genre.
There is also a sense of wanting to compare the beta to a 10 year old live service game in path of exile. Is it going to be as polished or as deep as poe at launch? Doubtful. But I feel this attitude is why companies increasingly just patch the same game for decades rather than try their hand at sequels. It's higher risk but in my opinion we want to see big titles get sequels rather than yet another expansion or dlc.
I don't mind the critical commentary. That's PCGamer's job. But I think the overall negative tone based on items that are transient within the betas isnt very helpful to the readership. Unless the idea is to push everyone just sticking to the aging titles in the genre.