Nope, no campaign, its a no for me. EA is still going to charge 60 bucks for it. I like battlefields pvp modes, i do, but i also like the campaign and with so many other shooters that are pvp only and not costing 60 bucks, im gonna be skipping it. I honestly laugh at people that say things like "noone plays battlefield for its campagins" when its literally the only reason i ever was interested in them. Im not talking about the original 2 either im sure those were fine as standalone pvp experiences, but Battlefield massively exploded in popularity and depth when adding campaigns, esp. the Bad Company ones, i know they arent some of the best campaigns out there, but they were still fun to play.
And, its EA, so to those who think that cutting the campaign means more resources for developing the pvp mode, youre wrong imo, they are just going to save on the resources not use up as many to do just pvp, id like to think differently but thats not how it works.
And, its EA, so to those who think that cutting the campaign means more resources for developing the pvp mode, youre wrong imo, they are just going to save on the resources not use up as many to do just pvp, id like to think differently but thats not how it works.