Recent content by nakedian

Back in the day I was excited about anything from Bethesda and just the sight of Todd Howard doing an announcement, these days not so much. I don't trust the company to do anything right anymore, so I'm not going to pre-order, not going to count on anything and will wait for the reviews.

Good point Oussebon, I've even been thinking about The Witcher 3. What if I asked the same question except using The Witcher 3. And that may be a good question, but from what we saw yesterday with Cyberpunk Wire this game is likely to be CPU intensive due to the NPC's. I think I'm going to...

My friend's dad had an original Magnavox Odyssey. You actually had to put a plastic overlay over your CRT TV screen which would inevitably be held on by static. We went over there as much as we could, but the games were kind of boring because almost everything was basically Pong.

You make a very good point about not knowing what the game will require CPU vs. GPU wise, thank you. I guess I was just comparing it to The Witcher 3 which seems to push both pretty hard. Also you kind of answered another one of my questions and that's about bottlenecking. As I understand it...

I am running an Acer Preditor X34 3440 x 1440 120 hz monitor. I have a Gigabyte Z390 Auros Pro motherboard with an Intel i5-9600K processor cooled by a Corsair Hydro series H110i GTX (280mm). My current GPU is an EVGA XC Geforce RTX 2070. I'd like to be able to run Cyberpunk 2077 at 100 fps...

This will date me but just about the ONLY game on our schools mainframe in Berkeley was Star Trek 1971. This was a text based Star Trek game and we actually played on printers. I cringe at the amount of paper we burned through. There was also a text based Blackjack that was meh.